Testing Teachers!?... Great Idea
An article in today's Republican (Found here: , it has been discovered that state education officials will be Seeking to boost student achievement in mathematics by focusing on how well prepared teachers are to teach what they're supposed to be teaching.
This makes me melt with joy. I really mean that.
The simple fact of the matter is that a large part of the education crisis in this country is due to the fact that those teaching and preparing our best and brightest are, well, anything but bright. It is a lot to expect the teachers themselves to teach what they do not know or understand. Tests have repeatedly shown, for decades on end, that college students who go into teaching score at or near the bottom among students in a wide variety of fields. No wonder teachers hate tests so much! And no wonder that they find innumerable fads more attractive than teaching solid skills, which they themselves may not have mastered.
For decades, our children have been incredibly outperformed in math, with American children almost ending up at or near the bottom when compared with children in other countries, DESPITE spending just as much time in the class room as students in foreign countries. Somehow, someway, this has yet to convince 'edgekaters' that they're doing anything wrong of course.
When asked the question; what is more important in math, that children 'know the right answers to the questions' or that they 'struggle with the process' of trying to find the right answer, 86% of these fools answered 'struggling' over knowing the answer according to a recent study. Good grief, Charlie Brown.
Learning match, like learning every other subject teachers don't bother to teach, is part of a bigger picture. That picture involves children 'discovering' their own knowledge rather than having teachers take things that are, you know, already known and passing them along to our youth. The concept of thinking that children will 'discover' something that took scholars and geniuses decades and generations to 'discover' is truly a faith to me, which passeth all understanding.
If it couldn't get any better, discipline isn't to be bothered with, either. Fewer than half of the professors of 'education majors' felt that discipline was 'absolutely essential' to the educational process. In fact one even wrote down 'when you have students engaged and not vessels to receive information, you tend to have fewer discipline problems'. All the evidence, in all actuality, points to the exact opposite, but who needs evidence when you've got a golden calf? We need more "teaching to the test" and "Testing to Teachers" so that these truly ridiculous dogmas can be subjected to evidence.
A good teacher is someone who stirs up from within us an internal curiosity. They make us eager to read books. They get us to try new things and prepare us for wanting to learn more and more. In order to be this type of teacher one needs to have that same fire, expertise and passion for whatever their intellectual pursuit may be. Sadly these days, that's not so much the case. Never mind the fact that teacher's don't merely 'know' their subjects. They don't care to learn them at all.
A new survey of education majors at American Universities paints a dismal picture, indeed. College students who are training to become teachers have little interest in, well, learning much of anything.
The Foundation for Academic Standards and Tradition, which is a nonprofit student advocacy organization with members all over the political and ideological spectrum are expressing great concern over the results. Here are just two sobering realities:
--49 percent of the 1,005 education majors surveyed had read no book, or only one book, that was not actually required in their courses.
--Barely a majority, 55 percent, regarded a liberal arts education as better than an education in a trade, and 60 percent think there's too much emphasis on the study of great books.
Apparently, these are the folks who're educating the next generation of Americans, but it's most definitely not clear how that's going to happen. "K-12 education was a top priority for most Americans this election year,'' says pollster John Zogby, who was one of the fine folks whom conducted the survey. "This survey revealed some compelling data about the nation's education majors.''
That's an understatement. In all reality, not all education majors are going to be horrible teachers, but let's face it, one needs to question the sanity of someone who chooses to major in 'education' when the idea of an 'Education Major' is oxymoronic unto itself.
However, what should be most disturbing to all of us, is that this group of education majors is so clueless as to their own ignorance that they've implicated themselves via their own shortcomings, not having any clue as to what they're doing. They're not only products of our now fully retarded Education system, but they fail to see, in any way, that they're contributing to more retardation. They're ignorant of their own ignorance.
What would posses someone to want to be a teacher if they aren't interested in LEARNING?
The public schools recruit from the education majors and private schools are more likely to draw on teachers with a greater depth of knowledge, because, well, they TEST their incoming teachers to determine their competence. That's certainly one reason that there exists a growing number of parents who're supporting school choice. In essence, school choice IS the school reform of choice. I'm willing to bet most who vote against school choice wouldn't ever send their kids to public school. After all, they wouldn't want your kids touching theirs! Who knows where they've been!
In the end, finding out why stupid people try to become exactly what they shouldn't ever be considered for is a problem that will take much studying. However, testing teachers in core competencies is at least a massive step in the right direction towards making sure our kids don't end up wearing helmets to work and eating their own boogers for the rest of their lives. Test those teachers!
2 comments:
Maybe I'm missing something, but...
Preparing kids for testing is part of what takes a HUGE amount of classroom time away from teaching. All teachers believe this; many parents do. The best teachers I USED to teach with have now left the schools in disgust; most have moved on to private schools, where they can TEACH, and standardized tests go away.
And so...to fix this...we should require that those few good teachers remaining in public schools spend some of the, say, 10 hours a day they currently use on class prep, paper-grading, reading Independent Education Plans (in a class of 24 I have seven kids on everchanging plans, and alawyer at my throat all day about all seven), nose-wiping, and -- when they have a minute, the joy of their life -- actually helping a student learn something -- on studying for a test instead?
I fail to see why the ability to pass a math test makes a teacher a good math teacher. It MIGHT be a good indicator of their math skills. It will certainly be a good indicator of their ability to test well. It MIGHT be a good indicator of their ability to prep for tests well, which in turn MIGHT be an indicator that those teachers are best suited...to help kids pass tests. Not learn math. Because, in the real world, math skills aren't about tests. They're about application, knowledge, skill and attitude.
You want to know whether teachers can teach? Set up an observation system -- most schools have one already, but make the results more visible to the community, and make consequences more serious. Set up a REWARD system -- keep teachers who can teach. Assume -- as teachers have always known -- that teaching TO the test results in better AVERAGE scores in some cases, and results in less FAILURES in most cases... but does not result in more HIGH scores OR a higher average in a given class. Trying to leave NO child behind requires lowest-common-denominator teaching. Testing shoudl be the last thing we want to celebrate. Accountability, true accountability, is absolutely vital...but since neither teaching nor understand can be measured with little circles and number two pencils, that accountability should come from elsewhere.
When you say "teaching to the test," we should acknowledge that you are usually not talking about those drill fests. Rather, teachers often use the phrase to refer to any course that prepares students for one of the annual state assessment exams required under the No Child Left Behind Act. For reasons that escape me, we never say a teacher is "teaching to the test" if she's using a test she wrote herself.
I'm sorry but aren't being taught enough basic academic knowledge. It's been replaced with 'creativity' and 'critical thinking' skills and these teaching models have produced neither. Oddly enough, there seems to be a correlation between the formation of teacher's unions in the 1960s and the decline of test scores. I do not think it is a coincidence.
The central idea behind testing math teachers is to insure that they still possess the basic, core competencies that many of America's teachers today lack. There needs to be a basic language threshold before one can teach. When they come up for review, they need to show that they still possess those skills. Teachers have very little in the way of requirements to fulfill. They cannot be fired easily. Asking them to keep up to standard on basic knowledge required to teach in a taxpayer-funded system isn't much to ask.
Post a Comment